Question ????, page-37

Hi goyim, I am having a lot of trouble with some of your post. I am not really sure where you are coming from or who you are supporting. The post seems to jump in its support, I have read it a dozen or so times, maybe you could clarify some of it for me?

The use of the word shills seems to have me bewildered the most. Are you saying / implying that there are shills on the IGS thread?

SHILL -
“A person engaged in covert advertising. The shill attempts to spread buzz by personally endorsing the product in public forums with the pretence of sincerity, when in fact he is being paid for his services.”

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=shill


The way I read you post is that you are saying it is OK for the “shrills” to post “whatever” and then you bag the “termites” for challenging the “shills”

Quote with the meaning of shill inserted –

“I have uncovered shills “people engaged in covert advertising. The shill attempts to spread buzz by personally endorsing the product in public forums with the pretence of sincerity, when in fact he is being paid for his services” on certain forums, there is substantial history of pointing out facts [with the pretence of sincerity] and then termites come out of the wood work to erode all conversation formation in a sweeping movement…………”

goyim, this is not intended to bag you, just trying to understand your post in its entirety. Are you saying it is OK to ramp it up in order to make comments like “Thank , I played the outta this and certain people are left trying to prop it up.”