The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it. George Bernard Shaw
ta that helped assuage my fears of what CHMPs agenda actually was. (AKA it presented a scenario and motivation I had not seen that explains stuff, even if it is cycnical accurate)
Well i wont discuss the other options. They were not conspiracy based but they were serious guessing at what might be wrong. Talking about stuff that isnt wrong as if it might be probably is beneficial to me or the process.
but ta, seeing where they can be naturally going, that still winds up at eventual approval in the near term (because IMO (as before): the product is good, and does work, and is very safe..), is good.