after re-reading, i agree with you guys. commercialising the direct interest, not commercialising the asset.
however i think that the clarification is in the report to highlight that the rights apply only if they sell the permit themselves, NOT if they were to sell themselves to someone else, i.e. accept a takeover offer.
Because otherwise, the IES rights would be a bit of a poison pill to a takeover. A potential suitor might think: "Sure, I can take 40% of Pandora + onshore for [$5M CMT mcap + premium], but if I have to then pay IES multiples of that, then i'm not interested"
I think Cott are trying to make it clear that that's not the case.
What do you guys think of my new interpretation? Maybe i'm just dreaming
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BDM
- Ann: Quarterly Activities Report & Cashflow
Ann: Quarterly Activities Report & Cashflow, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BDM (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $191.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
10.5¢ | 11.0¢ | 10.5¢ | $19.26K | 180.2K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
9 | 1036456 | 10.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
11.0¢ | 812633 | 6 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 06/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BDM (ASX) Chart |