Would you consider 16m @ 1137ppm of Nickel to be significant?
That's only 0.11% Ni correct?
When SIR began their aircore drilling at the start of 2012, I believe they came up with the following:
I'm not good at geology, nor do I fully understand what would be considered significant at such an early stage in exploration.
Is the idea that nickel showing up in the shallow holes is a possible sign of higher grade resource deeper down, and with the assistance of the EM surveying, targets can be identified for far deeper drilling which will possibly result in the higher grade resources being discovered, much like SIR achieved towards the end of 2012?
Thanks for your time,
Tim
BOA Price at posting:
13.5¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held