This has already been discussed in another thread by the same name, so why start a new one?
If the end user gets to use ALL the electricity by paying for the gas, what's in it for the third party funder? You know the unnamed one. Why is the third party's name a secret?
Please show, using numbers, how the third party can possibly make money. If no electricity is fed into the grid, how can they receive a feed-in tariff?
If the end user feeds all the electricity into the grid, they endup worseoff by having to pay the full gas bill. Anyone paying the gas bill to keep it running will make darn sure they use ALL the electricity produced.
This whole deal doesn't pass the sniff test. Is the 3rd party in any way associated or related to CDU? Is this deal still on now that the cap raise has closed massively undersubscribed? (If I was the 3rd party I'd want to know that the company I'm dealing with will be around to service/replace/honour warranty etc. A failed cap raise lowers that possibility).
I could have sworn that it was Synquasi that complained about the ''downrampers'' for going over old ground, and here you are doing it yourself.
CFU Price at posting:
0.7¢ Sentiment: Sell Disclosure: Not Held