China and US greenhouse deal, page-6

At the time of reading the Herald Sun write-up on COZ that was posted on HC in September (link reposted below) and reading the following, particularly the highlighted passage, I thought the carbon business's days were numbered and still do. From here on in it's all about the aquaculture business and I for one am not complaining as that was the reason I invested in COZ in the first place.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/busines...060787333?nk=0e3d03e50174250108a23b68ceec4f01

'There are shell companies that are totally repurposed, companies that gradually change their focus over time and others that radically change direction. Commodities Group belongs in that last category, having graduated from planting trees as carbon sinks to large scale prawn farming. The carbon business is still ticking along despite the rapid wane of carbon abatement policies but executive chairman Ian Trahar said there is little doubt that growing prawns is going to be the key to the company’s future.'

I also noticed that Gina Rinehart has been talking up the development of northern Australia again in recent days. Perhaps she could put some of her $20 billion AUD fortune to work in partnership with COZ to build Project Sea Dragon, a project that if built would not only be of national significance but global significance. Maybe they've already approached her and/or are already in talks with her? One would hope so given the publicity she creates, the deep pockets and even deeper connections she has, not to mention the fact that she is one of the biggest supporters out there for the development of northern Australia, something COZ stands to be a major beneficiary of should it ever become a reality.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-...darwin-to-spruik-northern-development/5911560