survivor, page-7

I would be happy if;

1) The board/management cleared the air.
2) ASIC investigated and found it was all good
3) The share price was 30c

I find it interesting that in the one breath, RB, you say things like "shareholders should not cry over spilt milk" and then blames shareholders who departed years ago for the ills of the company.

Would it be reasonable if some said that was hypocritical?

For at least a year, RB & Syd have been telling us that all is good in the company, and yet we're here. And the apparent all powerful effect of HC has not seen anything change.

We've still got;

1) large and growing salaries to our board
2) growing loans at 12%
3) no profitability
4) no PrIME shares/float
5) no Singapore business
6) no institutional investors
7) no money from Mr Goh
8) no answers to charges of illegal activity

Sure, it's all about to change....we've been hearing that from you, RB, now for over a year. Just tomorrow, wait and see.

By the way, RB, you did not accept any accountability for your "5 announcements in 2 weeks" post from February. Nor have you accepted the responsibility of your predictions of 2011 or 2012 or your "6 weeks" comment from 3rd June.

Unfortunately, RB, readers on HC will judge your credibility in the light of your comments here and the outcomes that have actually occurred at the company. To be clear, I have made no predictions, just merely asked questions. And I guess being the mouthpiece of the people who refuse to answer the reasonable questions being asked, your indignation reflects the seriousness and validity of the questions. The reason they haven't been answered, I guess, is because the answers are stunning and would counter the spin from the company. Any responsibility for the downward direction of price, must be accepted by those in control.