Ann: Explains High Grade Exploration Results , page-55

re: Ann: TRF: Explains High Grade Exploration... "I'd be interested to know how it looks from your point of view HC."

Dodgy as, OO. I was never sold on the gold story and picked up a few on the silver story pending further investigation. Needless to say I haven't loaded up yet.

That is a very solid interp you've given us there. IMO, nothing to disagree with jumps out. One immediate comment would be that they are committing the silver to shoots within the slab when they describe the mineralisation as confined to corridors. The question is the extent of them and their relationship to the gold structures as you describe.

And that's where the info gets difficult to reconcile. What is the extent of any skarn type replacement? The host has been described to me as an "impure limestone" along with the word "reacting". Is mineralisation tightly confined to where steeply dipping and perhaps narrow brecciated shoots intersect the limestone, or is it more pervasive as suggested by the comments about the extent of alteration across the whole "slab"?

Will we get 1/21 or 9/21 holes come good? Statistically, given the drilling didn't attempt to target the cross-cutting silver structures 9/21 would perhaps be pervasive.

And just going back over my emails, I now note that MP mentions magmatic fluids for the silver, whereas I'm sure I've read the gold bearing fluids are believed to be metamorphic in origin. Are they magmatic too? If they do think they are magmatic, then I now understand what they mean by looking for the source.

I've got to go right now, but obviously I'll need to ponder your interp, scribble those structures, re-read the early gold reports, and collate all the info to follow you up with something more coherent.

Thanks OO, for the time and effort to contribute in that valuable way.