game on!!, page-6

Companies are generally only willing to use others with JORC resources so up to this point CUX (and TUC) have not been included in others (or so that's what I have been told).

I wasn't having a go at CUX there - I was having a go at the lot of them. You can find similar faults in each of their presentations - the exclusion of data.

REAL comparisons are when you include every company and when you look at like v like (eg CAPEX and OPEX to arrive at similar products or CAPEX AND OPEX per dollar of product produced).

I find the more accurate you want to make your comparisons, the more difficult it gets.

As Ausheds has pointed out elsewhere, its easy to exclude the LYC Duncan deposits from the high HREO if you look at %, but when you look at total HREO it should be included etc.

I will spend time this week working CUX into my own like for like comparisons to evaluate for myself what I think of their resource and plans. Furthermore I will be checking to see if TMR update their data from this CUX release.

Right now RE stocks are "on the nose" but the reality is that some of them must "make it" - they cant all fail. Because of that I see the opportunity to get in at a point where the risk/reward ratios are very good.