results of meeting , page-9

Wendy S another great post thanks


you appear to have the greatest information about the company past and present so makes sense to ask you the questions if you dont mind as follows

1) If only a handful of voters control the destiny of the company as you say why was it not easy to sell to them why the board should change especially as you say they werent option recipients? Were they not given compelling reasons to support what was offered from your proposal for a change? Did you not engage them adequately or with enough time? Personally I am not opposed to any board change as long as the incumbent steps aside if they dont have the expertise to carry anything forward. if this board finds a project and they dont have the expertise to progress it I am assuming they will step aside without voting expenses.

2)
You mention not sucking sour grapes and looking at projects how could this happen when you have litigtion hanging over all shareholders for right or wrong reasons?
Being a astute business woman you would know no one will look at Motopia with litigation pending

3) So are you holding litigation over Motopia for personal gain or so we go bankrupt in 6 months waiting for the court date? is there another option?


With respect your thoughts would be appreciated remembering I dont know any of answers to above just asking as a shareholder

IMO DYOR