my lips now have to be sealed, page-31

I have read your posts and even cited one elevant to the discussion earlier today. And many of us here find it difficult to decipher your code and you refuse to state it in a way that is clear and concise. You made the original statement and then when called on it moved into a discussion of semantics.

RB, sorry mate but your lack of answers clarifying your own statements says everything. I don't blame you for back tracking. I would too if I was implicitly threatened with action by the board of NuSep.

I guess fortunately or otherwise, I don't have enough facts to make any such statements, which is why, mostly, what I post on HC are questions or responses to posts here or statements to the market.

If you believe that the 3 directors were dismissed, then DR Nair threw cold water over that fire and even "dissed" you in the process.

I do note your original post contained "sacked" and "wood" in following sentences. So perhaps the third definition IS what you meant?