Ann: Litigation , page-5

Hi All,

Interesting strategy by the board to put the already announced 249D in another announcement about the cBox litigation, you may note the date of the 249D is incorrect as well, it was issued on the 15th not the 19th but I guess accuracy is not too high on this Board’s agenda. Do you think they’re they concerned? It’s a feeble attempt to discredit me as I can and will post the proof of everything I say, if required or if moderated.

The litigation commenced early August 2012 after attempts for a solution with this board failed since August 2011.

We had not received any details of the AGM and its questionable resolutions until the 5th November causing the action of the 249D. (I ask why they didn’t put an announcement out about the litigation in August? But I suspect this is another one of the Board’s “good strategies” here which I may not comprehend fully, perhaps a bit like the Cypress deal?)

I am happy to discuss this in detail with anyone who wishes to call me 0404 001 277.

Please remember to get your votes in, tomorrow is the last day. While I urge people to Vote “NO” to all resolutions and avoid giving away our company for the price of a can of coke. It’s important to note that it is YOUR choice and whether you vote yes or no to the resolutions, the shareholders need to have their say. If the resolutions go through at the AGM, then let it be because it’s what the majority wanted and not because you didn’t vote.

IMO DYOR