dog??

Please stop talking about total ounces. Total ounces irrelevant....

Someone please explain to me how this project has sufficient oz near surface in sufficient concentration to justify the low capex and low opex development incl infrastructure in a very remote location.

Even Cygnet report just assumes low opex and capex open pit - and says thus is what CVY says - without explaining or attempting justifying this assumption.

We deserve more than this goose chase...lack of hard data.

Or put the dog out of misery.