directors motives, page-2

It is pretty simple.

Give me answers not complaints.

Tsang either provides a robust alternative that explains how he will deliver value to the remaing 78% of holders or he just shuts up.

So far a one page resume for Mr Stacpoole is nowhere near enough!

It is a poor resume at that.

Irrespective of the past l don't want to see a company with a valuable resource and a partner who will essentially fund them to DSO and first revenues being hijacked by a bloke looking to lock in his own personal IO supply for his plants in China.

That is all that l can infer without any supplied reasons.

At this stage l'll definitely be saying no!