does nearology count for nothing?, page-14

Newland,

"The fact" is "to ones knowledge", one "has an opinion".

Re the MEL thread, it seems others question the "sweeping
statements" also. Hence, one has been "rightly rebuked".

Dear Mithtathayla,

They say if you go fishing with the right bait you catch
exactly the species you are seeking, welcome back :)

Spruiking the knowledge of fact without defining a source,
tut tut. Supposedly "holding the said cookie" without
showing the cookie jar seems to be the chosen forte,
hmmmmmm....

Statements portraying insight can only be interpreted as
being in "cahoots". Todays example from the MEL thread:

"Fact. But don't want to say who told me." Dear, oh
dear.....

You're right, good business acumen would expect cupsatea
in Casino and it would be remiss to think MEL's deep
knowledge is shared with..... (too an extent)

Nice to see you are "sitting" on your holding and hope
you recover your losses.

Have a great day,

Gasbag ;)

P.S. It surprises me you slipped-up in your grammar :)