Thanks for raising that coal price issue - it obviously makes a huge difference to the viability of the Nuurst project.
I was using the price of $60/t for thermal coal at the Chinese border from TVN's "Acquisition of Coal Project Mongolia" announcement on June 24. They also mention that seabourne thermal is $120/t.
I believe them because this article and this one put seabourne coal prices at around $130/t. Note that this is for 5,500 kilocalories/kilogram coal whereas Nuurst coal is 6,688 - which will bring a higher price.
Therefore the price of $60/t at the Chinese border is quite realistic and probably even conservative.
I'm not sure why your article suggests a value of $20/t. What calorific value is it? Is that the price at the mine site (like anything, it will be cheaper at the front gate than hundreds of miles away)?
I can't see why it was suggested that the coal quality is less than expected. They were anticipating thermal coal with a calorific value of between 6,200 and 6,800 kcal/kg and have ended up with 6,688 - towards the higher end of the range.
I personally don't think coal quality was the reason for the drop from 9c. I think it was a simple case of being due for a pull-back - compounded by global market conditions spooking people. I actually feel I'm lucky to get back in at these prices - I didn't think we'd see under 7c again.
New Feature Announcement!
We’re excited to introduce the DealRoom portal, now live on site, providing users with exciting access to private equity opportunities for both pre-IPO and publicly listed companies.
See full details by selecting the new menu item named 'DealRoom' on our main menu bar or click below.
Stay ahead of the market, with HotCopper.