wuhan, page-12

The EIS and the meetings in China are two separate things. I don't think it's a given that one will follow the other. I would hope we weren't waiting for them to do proper research before they submitted their report for public review, but actually it was based on funding the project.

In fact releasing an EIS that would have a positive outcome, if funding was needed further, would actually make the project more attractive to outside investment, and would allow Boulder to have more of a commanding position on terms.

The whole thing about the EIS is that it IS a report they make public, so the public can vent their approval or dis approval that some rare extinct bird is nesting there or not. But, considering it's already in an area zoned industrial, one would think the people who made it industrial already looked into nesting of rare birds, winter tracks of extinct dinosaurs, and so on. But who knows...
Meeting info is useful when it is landmark type news.

Reporting on what Carl Moser had for breakfast is less important as that type of constant PR dribble means there isn't really that much to say the company is doing. Again, Boulder is a long term play in my eyes.