if keith were judged on share performance., page-2

Hello Flyboy, I agree in principle with your post but would would modify your recommendation. The problem with uranium is that only U235 can be used in a fusion reactor which is about 1/500 of the U238 mined; but the bigger problem is that the daughter products of U235 fusion reactors have very noxious half lives. The only justifcation for a u235 based fusion reactor (over a thorium based reactor see below) is that U235 can be used to make weapons.

In contrast to U235, thorium is a much better element to use as a nuclear fision reactor based fuel because its daughter products have much shorter half lives (i.e. much more environmentaly friendly) and it cannot be used to make nuclear weapons using present published technology. The trick therefore is to secure thorium not uranium deposits as the world move to environemtally and politically friendly nuclear fuel sources.

I personally don't think much of the Aztec dome based on the results published so far and I think even less of the commercial aspects of the TMX gold resources, its why I sold my 1.8 million shares in TMX, and did not buy back in. But I do think Keith Wells is an excellent geoolgist. Its just a pity he is CEO and not Technical Director. Having said that I will buy a modest amout of TMX at aorund 4 cents.

Please do your own research. My views are biased.