I have traded in CHM shares since before they were wound up in 2004. I believed back then and still believe now that the previous directors conducted shady deals that sent CHM down the drain. Why are the knockers so against a rejuvenated company fighting for shareholders/company rights? If the new directors pick up rewards along the way, how is that any different to any other company director in Australia?
little time left, page-30
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
