Guys, on one hand we have a highly repescted company called BBY that was rated by BLOOMBERG as "number one in the underwriting league for 2008 Q1" who without doubt can see the potential for QOL, check out the track record of the SP of other shares that they have underwritten.
And on the other hand we have Joooooooles, who has a track record of, of, of er um writing DRIBBLE
Jooooles, do you honestly believe that a company of BBY standing would even entertain the idea of suggesting to their clients to hand over $1 if they didn't think that they would profit from it ? Do you think that they would have run the ruler over QOL before comitting, particularly at times like these whereby the banks aren't even lending money to each other.
Some of the points that you bring up are so stupid that I almost feel sorry for you e.g. the point about trucking the concentrate to Brisbane first, and whack a bit more to the bottom line. For goodness sake, do you think that that would not have been taken into account from the first instance ? or do you think that someone popped up one day and said "how are we going to get this stuff to China ?"
Fair dinkum !!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- QOL
- is wolfram profitable the answer is no
QOL
queensland ores limited
is wolfram profitable the answer is no, page-10
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)