It has been some time since I put serious input into the Starpharma forum.
So here goes.
More than a decade ago Starpharma started on a journey to develop VivaGel™ BV formulation with active ingrediant SPL7013
Conducting nine trials up until now and bankrolling these tests to the tune of over a AU$100 million with the knowledge of enormous untapped demand globally , any sane person (including those on this forum),would think the strategy of company to be sound.
We had a SPA in place.
We had Fast Track status in places
We had Qualified Infectious Disease Production designation in place
We handed the FDA a 110,000 page NDA document - which was a culmination of many years work
We had open communications with the FDA......so there would be no surprises
A couple of weeks before PDUFA announcement we had a licensee who was going to put AU$28 million upfront on approval of FDA for the NDA in Starpharma's bank account and the balance of AU$114 million in milestones and inflection points
So what could go wrong
Nothing
Starpharma management were so confident of a positive outcome. I was 100% confident of a positive outcome as well as I am sure..........many of the forum participants
All that has been presented on this forum into the why's was conveyed in announcements (the emails forwarded to posters recently was also presented in announcements......all it has done is reinforce the previously transmitted news)
There is no doubt in my mind as some have put on this forum.......the goal posts have changed
It is so obvious
Remember staffers that were working on the NDA......some had left and new ones had entered the arena. Why is not important....
So the biggest question I ask myself over and over and over again........if there was open communications with FDA and Starpharma over the years in regards to an adequate NDA.......
why is it at 5 minutes to midnight that the FDA say they require confirmatory clinical data (which may not necessarily mean a new clinical trial) before approval
Like a poster has previously said......Starpharma had plenty of experience of what to expect from the FDA.......the board are not novice at this.
All the i's were dotted and all the t's were crossed
Posters have said something fishy is going on here and it is not the smell coming from persons with BV
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SPL
- The US$101million (AU$142.2 million) dollar question
The US$101million (AU$142.2 million) dollar question
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SPL (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
10.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.82M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
10.5¢ | 11.5¢ | 10.0¢ | $110.6K | 1.006M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 83046 | 10.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
11.0¢ | 30000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 6000 | 0.955 |
4 | 25073 | 0.950 |
1 | 3925 | 0.945 |
3 | 8847 | 0.940 |
1 | 10000 | 0.935 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.960 | 4540 | 2 |
0.965 | 15000 | 1 |
0.970 | 13906 | 2 |
0.975 | 10000 | 1 |
0.980 | 19012 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 15/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
SPL (ASX) Chart |