experienced board, page-20

Macrae, are you going to hold them to this?

Are we seriously going to say, even if they discover some magic billions of minerals, "no, you said you were going to stay under 50mill!"

Anyway, i post below the page 20 charts as well, and it is interesting that they also inidcate on charts EPS1-2 20-50mill, then also on charts EPS3-5 50-250mill, and then EPS>5 >500 mill.

The notes certainly contradict this, but is it possible they actually meant what is on the chart, in years 1-2 a 20-50 mill mc? ie not a 20 mill mc stagnant for 2 years.

I think they are really understating their prospects, so to not be guilty of the ramping, with which they are accused by their document header.