Share
5,127 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 367
clock Created with Sketch.
15/02/19
16:56
Share
Originally posted by debono
↑
I realize that a resource without means to recover it is of little benefit however the greater the resource the more viable it is to recover. I think too many posters have simply come on the VEC threads not to add value with countering views but to hang crap for no valid reason, whether it be because of Brewer or Boardman or delays or just about anything else. The few doomsayers are hopeful that VEC won't be successful probably not to down ramp to get in cheap but to just hang crap for their own reasons. Once the argument has started the line in the sand is drawn and the barracking becomes a constant. Size of resource is a deal maker . Resource upgrades can never be a bad thing. To expect mining not to be feasible without any justification is just playing with smoke and mirrors. If mining isn't feasible then we all agree that the resource size won't make an iota of difference however they wouldn't go into it with an expectation of it not being feasible therefore resource size will have a tangible effect on the share price imo.
I guess (hope) we will see soon enough.
Expand
I agree with everything you have said there.
Resource upgrade is absolutely positive, I just don't think its the main thing to move the share price up as many expect (because this is already a big resource). Declaring reserves is different though, IMO though of course.