ship is sinking, page-69

Woteva:

"For one it serves no purpose, two I just plain couldn't be bothered and don't have the time and three I have more respect for holders of the stock than to stoop so low."

Discussing issues does serve purposes. What is your purpose? To encourage people to buy?

Respect for holders? Do you hold my comments in such high regard that you think I influence the SP? Wow, I never felt so highly of myself!

I didn't realise discussion was only supposed to be of a positive nature. I thought an opinion was simply that - no more, no less - something to be debated? Personally I think you're the one attacking others and not discussing issues based on fact. I don't think you have any, which is why you can't be bothered anymore. If you look back at posts, you will see how you fail to respond to issues raised.

If you are that frustrated, why don't you put us on "ignore"? I've got a few people who I think post utter rubbish and I've got them on ignore. MY HC experience is so much more pleasant.

Yes, I will respond to your comment. I don't discredit every single positive post. I only try to discredit posts which I believe are not credible.

I have no concern with how you "look" nor do I influence that. If you think you look like a fool, that's your problem.

I don't "bash" all stocks I think are dogs. Just MON, as an ex-holder and interested follower of its progress. Your bad luck I guess. Once again - use the "ignore" function if you don't like it.