@Secondopinion
Thx kind words and do trust I present in a balanced and fairly unbiased manner with supportive evidence to my statements & conclusions.
In fairness to @playez I can see what they are saying however I don't believe it is as absolute and categorical as they make out.
Is it stacked against POH now - yes.
Does it mean dead here & now - no.
Have they got work cut out - yes.
I agree as u say, some supporting evidence from playez re their statements would be appreciated however there is nothing that says they have to.
Is TPGS a direct competitor in the "same" DDS right now - not that I can see and happy to be corrected if so.
Will TPGS become a direct competitor in the future - possibly if they move into that DDS.
That is when POH should provide direct comparison studies as TPGS would then be a competitor but not yet.
Seeing playez has now shifted part of the discussion around supply chain, does TPGS have that advantage & scale - absolutely as it's been around that long in oral DDS so to be expected.
Does that mean POH couldn't secure production & supply chain if required - no.
Must first have a product requirement to that level to proceed down that path and obviously POHs focus atm still is product dev and ultimately commercialisation first then supply chain in parallel.
I still believe TPGS is not developed as yet for transdermal / injectable however if it does become available then yes, existing infrastructure will assist it.
But does that also mean these producers / suppliers couldn't also assist with TPM?
Does the mkt say there can be a monopoly of only one transdermal / injectable compound support?
Even from isochem pdf it clearly states that the DDS discussed is merely being investigated at this time (pg 2).
https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pmcisochem.fr/sites/default/files/documents/ISOCHEM%2520TPGS%25202015%252008.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi36Lq1mt_eAhUHr48KHc4-DFoQFjACegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw0i5szO5YQ_vP7zoOaRps-g&cshid=1542587606594
While here and couldn't see mention of it on a thread search (maybe in an Ann somewhere but not checked?), anyone know of Lambada and how they fit?
http://www.lambdacanada-cro.com/targeted-penetration-matrix-tpm-innovative-transdermal-delivery-system/
Cheers FMF
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- POH
- Ann: Phosphagenics Arbitration Award Issued
Ann: Phosphagenics Arbitration Award Issued, page-224
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 37 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add POH (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
0.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! n/a |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
POH (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Andy Udell, CCO
Andy Udell
CCO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online