Did you actually read what I wrote ? How is teaming up with a MM pumpy ?
The site I posted above is just a 2 acre site in Oregan that was keen on the technology, that is 8 cameras alone or a $104K order. Compare that to the few they are placing on building sites and others ... nothing pumpy about it
There are literally hundreds of recreational cannabis growing sites now that need this sort of protection
As I also said, hemp cultivation is another ball game. The sites there are sometimes 10-20 times the size of that one, they also need to ensure no unauthorised protection
So if it is the law and part of the regulatory process they must ensure protection, and this technology is perfectly suited to it, then why shouldn't they chase it ?
The size of these sites are all 8-100 camera size deals, not 1-2 on local building plots