Ann: TOV: Tribune Resources Limited Orders, page-31

Believe in what stuff?

You mean that a guy who holds possibly one fiftieth of the shares in the company goes to a kangaroo court were orders have been made that could see all of the Billis related party shares handed on a platter to investment bankers and stock brokers to do whatever they like with. Shares that by virtue of the same orders belong to those parties as the proceeds of any shares sold will be returned to them. What part of that makes sense? What part of that is consistent with the rule of law?

As I’ve said before (many times) the number of shares in Tribune held by Sierra Gold (for example) has been the same for well over two decades. What right has the government got to take them and sell them under any circumstances? It is just institutionalised theft that is happening here. Every Australian should become aware of what the government is doing here. Taking the property of a hard working Australian and handing it to investment bankers and stockbrokers that have no right to it to dish out to their scum mates in which ever way they please. The most disgusting thing I have ever seen in all my time investing.

Let’s take NST’s major shareholders to the takeover panel and ask them to tell us how control over NST is exercised, who is really behind the nominee accounts that between HBSC, JP Morgan and Citicorp hold 60% of that company, how they manage to avoid Australian takeover laws and loan out shares to the ETF funds that distort the markets they operate in and ask ASIC why it turns a blind eye to the scum that illegally front run the ETF rebalances using insider information to rob money from regular investors.

You are just blinded by your personal vendetta against the guy who laid the golden eggs because you are small minded and jealous and unwilling to walk up to a mirror to see who is really responsible for your own bad decision to swap out of TBR into BDR. Esh