"Ethically-minded holders of RFF would surely sell if they vehemently objected to alleged predatory purchasing of irrigation rights. No point being "devastated" while still making cash from such actions." -- puska.
The correlation between ethics and profit is tenuous at best. In this hypothetical the land remains there whether RFF buys it or not. Is it ethical to let the land go to ruin, unsold and unused, while food prices rise, pressuring tightly budgeted families, partly as a result less land under cutivation?
Ethics, morality and empathy are subjects for another forum. It is what it is.
"Money doesn't talk, it swears." -- Bob Dylan.
OV
Ann: Queensland cattle and cotton property acquisitions, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RFF (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.88 |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $768.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.88 | $1.89 | $1.88 | $619.0K | 328.7K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 57184 | $1.88 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.90 | 6996 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RFF (ASX) Chart |
