Ann: Change of substantial shareholder, page-7

Spare me the psychology and your rewriting of history. I mention Creasy in one context only and you use it as an absolute and sole explanation of my position? Weird.

Your positions are so opaque (your 'true position' was a term you used in a rare slip indicating not all you say is true) it would be a gigantic task to make you accountable for them and line up explanations with actual moves. Sorry if I don't have the energy for that...

I understood your post perfectly, and I'm pointing out errors and inconsistencies. Which you studiously ignore. Nothing new there.

I'm not here to get along or find followers. Please, don't judge me by your own standards. I'm here for discussion, and the idea that out of a dialectic the truth will emerge. Always have been.

I've made salient points and you try to limit this to a discussion of the SP!

After delivering a volley of insults*

(* Look at your first line, that's a doozy.

Then look at the end of the next paragraph.

Then look at the beginning of the last para.

Then look at your last line).

You sling mud and expect me to ask "how high?" when you say "jump".