Lots of pointless bickering at the moment, also possible some might be losing some perspective here, given that the IP results are so promising, some are expecting a "hole in one"..... a term our 'dear friend' Punter45 has recently used.
Food for thought comes from a report from our Fosterville friends up the road. This was a stellar report, but notice what it took to achieve it?
2 holes with visible gold is great, but it took
39 drill holes to find 2!
http://intel.rscmme.com/report/Kirkland_Lake_Gold_Ltd_Robbins_Hill_2-5-2018
Fosterville, as amazing as it is, only about 5% of the holes netted VG, and the grades were variable.
Some of us may be pinning our hopes on a 'hole in one", but on Fosterville's experience that's a pretty slim chance. Who would call a golfer a dud if they didn't happen to get a hole-in-one on the first hole? I'd still be pretty impressed if they managed a birdie!
Those with weak hands may well drop their bundle on indifferent assay results, but if Fosterville is anything to go by, it's gonna take more than 1 or 2 holes to determine what we have at Cahill or Nagambie, but even if they happen to come up short after multiple drill holes, what about Wandean or any other anomalies in the 2000 sqm? hmm.
