Fair value market cap analysis?, page-92

Loch Fyne at Matlock (in Melbourne Water Catchment) was also permitted for bulk sampling.

I’m obviously light on in terms of current costs of decline development but, as stated, I had not included services.

Given that MS is high grade, narrow vein and dilution is to be avoided I would think that the existing shaft access would suffice until such time that sufficient ore zones were identified to permit multiple work headings. If a second shaft for haulage were to be sunk I would think that it would be on the underlay to keep it within the dyke structure and as close as possible to the zones at depth.

This is all conjecture as big dollars are involved. I too miss the involvement of the Bill Morgan’s, Arvi Parbos et al.