So what is your solution if you think a 249D is a mistake. This management is incompetent btw, an obvious fact. As to your inference in another post that the 249D will kill the SP, actually incompetence did that (and obviously the drill bit at Turesi). By incompetence just need to look at OHD as a reminder.
But forget arguing past my first sentence above, so the real question is what is your solution if you think a 249D is a mistake? As far as I see it, the 249D is just a mechanism for SH to say this management needs change - if the management stay the SP is cactus anyway even, as I suspect, the acquisition might be more land to explore in Guyana (probably a move to cobalt for example but even that will do little to SP IMO with the same management given the past indiscretions of management))
I know I said I wouldn't post but those opposing the 249D haven't made a case around what is the solution here, given the incompetence of the past. A basic question so over to you for an answer.
This thread is reminding me of my youth crouching over the toilet bowl after a huge night out on some serious turps after the hangover set in.
