Inference is akin to nominating, considering the bulk of your post was centred around the negative attitude towards management and the fact that the said poster/s went on and on about it would/could only draw one to the conclusion of who you were referencing - not rocket science bearing in mind that was the general consensus of the cheer squad that one did go on and on and on, personally I am pleased I did as holders awareness of the faults of the current management are all but exposed for their inept abilities and their attitude towards the shareholders.
You really don't comprehend there is a very vast difference in highlighting the inadequacies of management to the detriment of my holding versus the ramping for self benefit. Then have the contradictory predisposition of taking on the "white knight" persona claiming that you are concerned for the shareholders whereas in your former position you held the same shareholders in an almost contemptible vein.
