Re Life Sciences, page-2

deregistered....... and the plot continues to thicken...........

i would be very interested in having a look through those books.

This raises a few honest questions that i think should be answered.

1. Why would a Bell Potter employee raise money for Optiscan through a company that he is a sole director of and not through Bell Potter?

2. Why did Optiscan not continue using Bell Potter/ Life Sciences for the last raise given that the previous three had been successful... instead using Pattersons?

3. Why was Life Sciences de-registered only 6 weeks after (Nov 5) the the completed Optiscan Pattersons raise?

4. Why was the market not informed of a potential or perceived conflict of interest between Jeremy Baldock Life Sciences / Bell Potter when Alan Hoffman was made Chairman. Given that they are related. There could be a perceived conflict if the person raising money (through a company he is the sole director of) and the Chair of the company having the funds raised are related.


5. What is Bell Potter's stance on this? As a matter of opinion, i would be interested from a commercial point why Bell Potter would be happy if one of their employees was raising money through a private company and not through Bell Potter? Is that usual?

6. Does Archie's resignation have anything to do with Optiscan selecting Pattersons over Life Sciences/ Bell Potter?