Share
14,265 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 200
clock Created with Sketch. 22/02/18
12:36
Share
Originally posted by dolcevita
↑
I should have highlighted this:What will work with the battery space is a combination of things. Like an accumulation of different improvements added together. So a successful result giving a colossal overall improvement would mean adoption of our tech, in combination with say, specially formulated silicone using another tech, with a battery of a particular type using another tech. me that started the talk about Panasonic. Other posters brought that up and I've previously checked that out. For some reason they aren't currently on the list of Polaris collaborators. So I asked the question with "Panasonic?" the regulatory barriers to adoption aren't the same with the battery space as they are with diagnostics .it wasn't economic to adopt. GC imagined that companies would simply go through the hurdles with the regulators (to show efficacy and safety with the FDA) and adopt our technology because it is the best .No FDA = no costly regulatory barriers . This is entirely within the commercial space. Safety and risk are internalised by the adopting company.Added with other improvements (which aren't necessarily a threat to our tech far from it), they all go into the mix to create a hugely more efficient battery. This is what I meant by cumulative.a set of different ones, added together to make a super battery.
Expand
So to be a threat to our Anteocoat another tech would need to be doing precisely the same thing to the silicon, using a different method (since our method is covered by patent). I don't think the odds of that are high at all.
(20min delay)
