Why is it taking so long??, page-7

THX has been churning a lot out of very little for a while now; the promo has been ramping up a lot at the expense of reporting the geology and giving a clear picture of the prospectivity. So it's hard to guague what is really going on.

At least with AUR, you get a reasonably good level of geological disclosure. Not a direct metre by metre lith logor anything, and not absurd spreadsheets of geochem data, but enough to play around with some ideas. It's a good level of disclosure.

Chart wise, the volume has died off at 6.2-6.4c so this seems to be the bottom.

I think that by now the assay results should be in. So HQ, as Shady puts it, must be chewing the cud on the meaning. It can take a few days to do this. For instance, lets say my hypotheticals are correct and AUR re-interprets this as a series of E-W striking veins cutting the basalt. In the very least the company would have to re-do the diagrams (1-2 days) and chew the cud on the wording so VHMS junkies don't get scared by weird talk of some new model, and re-draft the diagrams a few times and redo the Table 1. Plus try and make sense of the DHEM.

Or, alternately, the assays are total butts and they have to try to explain why anything is anything anymore.

It's not like you load the assays in, refresh your browser window and press 'print'.