The Truth About Vaccines, page-71

That link merely confirms that vaccines are indeed unsafe!

What evidence exists that proves the current vaccination schedule is safe?

Here’s yet another example of how medical authorities allow vaccine manufacturers to get away with scientific fraud to protect their sacred vaccination programs (because once the masses realise the fraud they know they will lose public faith in vaccinations and the focus will then turn on them);

105 seniors died after taking part in two Fluzone high-dose vaccine trials, and 91 died after getting the regular Fluzone vaccine..

..Two clinical trials were conducted before Fluzone received approval. Both studies were led and sponsored by Sanofi Pasteur, the vaccine manufacturer itself (clear potential for conflict of interest).

In the first study 2,573 adults ages 65 and older received the Fluzone high-dose and 1,260 received regular Fluzone shots. Out of those a surprising number of seniors, 156 high-dose and 93 regular-dose recipients, had a severe adverse event (SAE) within 6 months post-vaccination.

In addition, 16 high-dose and 7 regular-dose recipients died between 29 and 180 days post-vaccination. But as the package insert received by unsuspecting patients puts it, “no deaths were reported within 28 days post-vaccination.”

Pharmaceutical companies have been known to present and phrase study results in ways that downplay the risks, and many have wondered if this is indeed the case with Fluzone, including the website Health Impact News in a 2013 article that went viral on social media. Usually studies report the results in round numbers, such as what adverse reactions happened during the first 30, 60 and 90 days. In this case the study chose to state in the package that no one died during the first 28 days. But a total of 23 (high-dose and regular dose) participants died starting on day 29.

Why did they choose the 29th day to begin counting?


And regarding informed consent (a fundamental human right);


..There are two important parts to this consent: you are signing that you understand the risks and that you cannot sue the company if adverse reactions occur.

To fully understand the risks, you would have to read the full information sheet about Fluzone or Fluzone High-Dose, which includes the data on clinical trials and deaths post-vaccination, as well as almost 30 adverse reactions (from mild to potentially life-threatening) reported post-approval of the vaccine. However, this sheet is printed for the health provider only, and they are not likely to show it to the patient (could they be hiding something)?

What does the patient receive? – An official patient information sheet that only lists pain, aches, tiredness and headache for side effects of Fluzone high-dose and tells you to ask your health provider about the rest. This is where as a patient, you have to be vigilant and ask very specific questions and do your own research.

The second part of your consent is understanding that you cannot sue the pharmacy that gave you the shot, but also it is important to know that you cannot sue the manufacturer of the vaccine as well..

Read more here; http://althealthworks.com/9054/105-...flu-shot-yet-it-is-still-on-the-marketyelena/

Patients can only provide informed consent when they have all the information. Not the highly edited sanitised version which overstates efficacy and downplays risks. Start by reading the vaccine inserts before allowing anyone to inject it into your body of that of your child.

Here’s just one example;

Dr. Suzanne Humphries on Gardasil
Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Polly Tommey go through the Gardasil inserts and explore how the safety and efficacy research was done and what the results really were;