You say 'extension to conductor 5'
It's my belief that it is generally recognised now that there was once one ore body in existence and that subsequent faulting and fracturing split and separated it into DeGrussa and the conductors. How many lenses there were is not known, but my guess is that there would have been many.
1. Is SFR looking for another separated part (near C5)? Is that what you are saying?
2. Or is it looking for a new ore body created at a different time and place?
In the end it doesn't really matter though as minable cu/au is minable cu/au regardless of its origin. However, from an exploration perspective, it does matter, imo. Why, what, where etc.
THX's Red Bore vhms cu deposit is probably one that is separate from DeG and the Cs. Monty fits that description too. Imo, SFR is looking for new ones in and around Doolgunna, as also are THX and RNI - and not an extension of C5.
My question to you might seem to be just about semantics to some, but it's much more than that. I read this as about finding a new and different deposit.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SFR
- Here it is
Here it is, page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 13 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SFR (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
$10.27 |
Change
0.060(0.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $4.190B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$10.31 | $10.42 | $10.18 | $14.51M | 1.416M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 5465 | $10.26 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$10.29 | 2241 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
8 | 36219 | 6.760 |
10 | 36962 | 6.750 |
8 | 31360 | 6.740 |
6 | 17781 | 6.730 |
8 | 33067 | 6.720 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
6.780 | 14048 | 3 |
6.790 | 31638 | 7 |
6.800 | 41939 | 10 |
6.810 | 45076 | 14 |
6.820 | 8156 | 3 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 22/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
SFR (ASX) Chart |