Sorry DDZX, you must be a politician. The question raised is in the presentation - you have simply given the same information presented a different way. Does anyone know why RWD quote an in brine and an in situ measure and why one is half the other? As a FURTHER example please see the results table at http://rewardminerals.com/index.php/investors/asx-announcements 12 November 2015 Aooendix 2: In-Situ Assay Results.
The rule of thumb with SOP is K grade x 2.23. Do your own calcs on the K grades in this results table and see what you come up with. The derived K2SO4 grades are NOT K x 2.23, but K x some other factor. This is why it is reasonable to say that RWD use a different measure (NOT UNIT) to measure their SOP grades.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AMN
- Ann: Positive Scoping Study for the Mackay SOP Project-AMN.AX
Ann: Positive Scoping Study for the Mackay SOP Project-AMN.AX, page-15
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 48 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AMN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
14.5¢ |
Change
0.010(7.41%) |
Mkt cap ! $60.70M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
13.5¢ | 14.5¢ | 13.5¢ | $4.941K | 35.18K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 30000 | 14.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
16.0¢ | 74741 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 5555 | 0.180 |
1 | 30979 | 0.175 |
5 | 69411 | 0.170 |
2 | 106061 | 0.165 |
2 | 18611 | 0.160 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.190 | 10525 | 1 |
0.195 | 28699 | 1 |
0.200 | 10206 | 2 |
0.205 | 15888 | 2 |
0.210 | 8238 | 1 |
Last trade - 13.05pm 26/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
AMN (ASX) Chart |