Well at least you now admit that your FA is worth FA!!! (actually I think it might even be 1-1 = -1). Don't even try with your bastardization as it only creating Frankensteins.
And while I agree that TA has its merits and its functions - and I leave that and some of my money with real pros whose sole purpose is algorithmic technical trading funds. That would be those that have real multiple analysis tools.
IMO your cup is poisoned. Your assumptions (as so far displayed) are IMO far from reasonable. They look "manufactured". Your claims sound like the one-eyed man in the land of the blind and ergo you should be King.
I'm not sparring with you. I'm trying to help those that read your posts decipher what has merit and what ought to be challenged (and there is shiteload of meatloaf in them).
And your
"Your IP30, capital efficiency comments all sound a bit wankery to me. Kind of like the highschool student who puts big/ complex words into an essay yet it could be done in a far simpler way which conveys the same meaning in a better way and better holds the audience."
illustrates that.
Did you just get a computer and some freeware (nothing wrong with open source) technical analysis software. Maybe some doji and candlesticks or OBV methods.
Fair go wanker. Your first post in the thread and then just the chart picture and points 1-4 is your technical analysis effort. Shoulda stopped there!! KISS TA.
Good luck traders - whose going to be the bunny that buys
@bruutz82 share for 0.9 cents? When you do remember to post an avalanche of positive posts so you too can exit at 1.2 cents - maybe even to
@bruutz82 who could talk it up to 1.8 cents and gain a quick exit.
Rinse and Repeat trading speculation for and using your own words
"a dodgy small oil company" - are you suggesting something isn't right?
