I read the first line then stopped, presuming the rest of your post would be just as contradicting and hence, a waste of time addressing.
Thus, I'll refer to your first comment only.
The company has NOT proposed any new resolution for the options that are in all likelihood going to lapse without being converted.
You, specifically asked; why SHOULD THEY offer any such thing? Anyone asking such a question implies they clear believe they shouldn't otherwise it'd be uneccessarry to ponder as such.
It seems you're trying to convince yourself your argument(s) has foundation. We can all see it sadly doesn't. If you seek to pursue discussing this with me, perhaps give the childish jibes a rest...thanks greatly
P.s. I'll now return to your post to continue finish reading it.
