Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

IGS

Click for more information

0.00%

0.3¢ international goldfields limited...

Ann: Response to Query, page-26

First 26 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Kiwi67

5,656 Posts.

1

14/10/15

18:21

Post #: 16176970
Share

Originally posted by MACLEOD22 ↑

KIWI

I know that you have difficulty in reading ,basic comprehension and remembering post content. So once again read the following very carefully.

My sentiment on all my posts on IGS has been "NONE". None does not imply BUY. I have never suggested that posters buy on HC based upon my feedback from various sources. Kindly produce facts to support your claim. And while you are at it facts on who purchased based upon any of my IGS posts.

I repeat that I have not spoken to OKAP executives , that is management and staff in the Perth office, for over two years. Rather than promote the OKAP brand I have done the opposite stating my past losses and disappointments. Yes I have supported IGS..FACT.

Have I sought feedback from sources who may have a connection in some way with OKAP? The answer has always been YES. Brokers, consultants and directors of OKAP companies ... YES. Never denied this fact. How else could I have obtained feedback which I share on HC?

ASIC to investigate me.... let them go for it. I have copies of all emails and diary notes on the companies I have invested in going back many years. Maybe you can provide them with facts????

Now lets review extracts from my damming posts on IGS and BMZ forums and see where I have mislead buyers, told lies, spread misinformation, spread disinformation etc. Please read them carefully KIWI.

11.8.15
Anything that I share comes either directly from the company or its representatives. Feedback is always as a direct response to emails sent seeking updates and reasons why milestones have not been met.
If readers are not confident of a posters reputation just place them including me on ignore

12.8.15
In the meantime I share and encourage readers to do their own research. Those who do not trust me should place me on ignore.
13.8.15
May I suggest that you read the latest ASXannouncements. Info matches up to what I was told and shared on HC. Nothing to do about spreading lies , unsubstantiated info etc.
17.9.15
From what I have been told (and no doubt always subject to change)
21.9.15
I said that " My understanding ( which implies speculation based upon purchasing majority holding)
23.9.15
I have not exchanged emails nor spoken to Peter Landau for over two years. Have not spoken to OKAP EXECS for a similar timeframe.
12.9.15
Naturally I have indicated why I have invested in IGS. I have also told readers to do their research on the project
3.9.15
I shared PPR's reply to my query but the master and his supporters did not believe. Called me the whisperer because I relayed facts from the source. Typical of down rampers.
6.9.15
I followed up a week later enquiring about SANTA FE. Again was told it was not a major issue in the Winter Gardens merger.
6.9.15
The OKAP rep sought answers to my questions. At the end of the day all us shareholders can do is enquire and report back. Time then reveals if we have been told the truth. It's nothing about whispering and ramping.
It's a pity that some posters cannot understand this basic concept. They always suspected an agenda.
In my opinion IGS were never going to find a buyer for those Santa Fe shares. The company had a massive debt and no production I recall. What a company says and reality does not always match

XXXXXXXX
Interesting post from Me Too..................
…..Never said you were spreading lies…. That's not what your mate KIWI is stating!

Expand

Well isn't that a lovely selection

Here's a few for ya.

06/09/15
I followed up a week later enquiring about SANTA FE. Again was told it was not a major issue in the Winter Gardens merger

03/09/15
KIWI

Yes SFG financials were included BUT it has no effect on the Winter Gardens venture going forward. THATS WHAT IS IMPORTANT TO SHAREHOLDERS.

01/09/15
Poor Kiwi

he would have been so distressed after reading this latest announcement.

So the Winter Gardens transaction is still a goer.

So IGS/Winter Gardens venture is not impacted by the Sante Fe Gold.

IGS requests being a member of the creditors committee. All good.

macca
NKP FAIL
CCC FAIL
KAB FAIL
RRS FAIL

IGS. Hmmmmm. Looks like every other Okap company to me.I would call that a clear trail of misinformation!

Last edited by Kiwi67: 14/10/15

IGS Price at posting: 0.2¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
3 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply

Top Stories

MIN

MinRes's Ellison knows he screwed up – for that reason, hunt for new Chair to be sped up

ACW

This biotech stock raised $11M in a risk-off environment. Its Alzheimer's drug could change the game

WC8

Pan Asia rebranding to 'clear confusion' after bagging $35M for Chile projects

History-making uranium sample grades and an imminent drill run. Infini Resources is poised to transform in 2025

CXM

'Taking money from the market': Garbage giant cleans up as this week's Hot Stock tip

There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...

First 26 Last

Add IGS (ASX) to my watchlist