SIR vs AON

Don't shoot me guys for yet another comparison between an ugly duckling turned into a beautiful swan (Sir) and Apollo, we are yet to find out its true description. In the year 2012 in the month of April Sir had announced this:
STRONG EM CONDUCTOR BENEATH COPPER AND NICKEL ANOMALY AT FRASER RANGE (Date 18 April 2012) now this was the first exciting announcement from Sirius on the verge of their Nova/Bollinger discovery they drilled this target conductor and struck riches.

- Now our conductor has been described in this way:
The EM response is possibly indicative of massive sulphides, and is located below a surface copper geochemical anomaly. Now this gives me hope Sir conductor was beneath the peak nickel/copper anomaly ours is below the surface copper geochemical anomaly. This gives me a lot of hope however what lies beneath the surface no one knows.

I feel as though Fraser Range has been taking the spot light for the past three years companies are drilling left right and centre, identifying em conductors and share prices run on this fact however our conductor at Apollo although has not been advertised to a great deal still fits the adequate requirements of a discovery of massive sulphides type. This conductor lies within a very large gravity anomaly (6 km to be exact), copper has been identified through calrete sampling with the conductor lying below this surface. The conductor is 2000 siemens, the level of conductivity is not dependent upon the strength a conductor could be 7000 siemens however may not represent any sulphides. I feel as though given the prospects stated above this company should at least be 2.5 cents in my opinion. Companies over at FR are doubling and tripling due to conductors which thus far been unsuccessful in proving up mineral sulphides.

I just hope our conductor hits the mark.............Please lord let this not be a dud!