what is really happening?, page-91

Ah thanks for that motboy!

So a direct reproduction of what AM sent to you.
So AM is responsible for that glaring spelling error.

Should we be concerned?
Did he just mis-hit a key?
But the spelling in the quoted example would be hard to explain away as a mis-hit. I mean "reinterpreted" is certainly a good bit different from the one reproduced.

Or does the mis-spelling hold a clue to explain the lack of communication that fails to flow from AM.

I always like my CEO's to have a reasonably good grasp of English as she should be spoke. It does help with providing clear and exact communications that provide information in sufficient detail to satisfy me as a shareholder.

So AM has a chance to allay my fears in the last week of January though I do have some other concerns about his message to you motboy apart from the mis-spelling.

Too much wriggle room built into that reply.